Comment on bell labs milestones

Revision as of 3 March 2014 at 22:23.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

`I like the way this set of four milestones now reads. By using the concept of multiple milestones, the person submitting the set has now, in my opinion, solved the previous problem of having various discordant accomplishments listed. Bell Labs accomplshed a great deal in the period of 60 years from 1925-1984. This ingenious approach of using accomplishments in four major categories, with a milestone for each, although clearly far from exhausting all the major accomplishments, does provide an overview to how significant the activities at Bell Labs were.

    Mischaschwartz19:25, 4 March 2013

    I also agree with the group milestone. It avoids the possibility of one for every advancement of technology over the years. We can recognize the progression of solutions and recognize them at one time.

      Fiorenza19:02, 5 March 2013

      IEEE Milestone Program style is that year, or the range of years, must appear in the title of each milestone. This will allow shortening the citations by removing the introductory phrase "From 1925 thru 1983" from each, so that they fit the word limit.

        Administrator416:14, 11 October 2013

        I have a problem with the first claim in the 4th plaque, namely, "the first facsimile service (1925) There were at least 2 earlier commercial facsimile services in Europe, The first existed between 1865 and 1870 between Paris and Lyon, France, and the second better-known one between 1907 and 1910 connecting Berlin, Paris, and London. Also, RCA began transatlantic fax service between the U.S. and Europe in 1922. Hence, this claim is not true and should be deleted from the citation. Please ask former HC member Jonathan Coopersmith if more details are needed.

        --Sheldon Hochheiser

          SHH17:58, 15 October 2013

          I agree with Mischa. There is so much involved in this milestone that we could argue about details forever. I think it is ready for approval

            Feisel20:20, 16 February 2014

            I concur that the proposal is ready for approval.

              Sherwoodluo22:23, 3 March 2014