Difference between revisions of "Thread:Milestone-Proposal talk:The 20 inch Diameter Photomultiplier Tubes/a few comments"

(New thread: a few comments)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided.  The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in  proton decay, , or  elementary particle physics. Or was research dedicated to spotting supernovas?
+
This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided.  The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in  proton decay, or  elementary particle physics, or  spotting supernovas.

Latest revision as of 20:01, 16 July 2013

This proposal is fine. I thought there was a miscount in the number of PMTs somewhere in the documents provided. The citation can better indicate what the PMT's are for: support research in proton decay, or elementary particle physics, or spotting supernovas.