First-Hand:The First Continuous Visible Laser
Contributed by Alan D. White
It is difficult to recreate today the sense of excitement and expectancy, and the enormous interest that arose during the early days of the laser in 1958-62. James P. Gordon, Herbert J. Zeiger, and Charles Townes' demonstration of gain and oscillation at sub-millimeter wave frequencies in ammonia had shown inverted populations were a potent new source of coherent electromagnetic energy. In 1958, Townes and Arthur Schawlow had pointed the way to extend this result to optical frequencies. But the sticking point was the gain medium which had to have at least two connected levels showing population inversion.. Numerous suggestions for suitable media appeared in the literature. Ruby, caesium vapor, potassium vapor and other gases, and fluorescent crystals were all proposed and some rejected. Selecting the right medium was crucial; no one wanted to work with a medium unless there was some good indication that inversion was likely. Inversion appeared to be a rare phenomena presumably because nature seemingly favored thermal equilibrium everywhere. In retrospect, this seems quaint. Now we know if one dumps enough energy fast enough into a system with distinct energy levels, one or more pairs of them will usually invert. One of the seemingly poorer candidates, ruby, later turned out to be the first visible laser to operate successfully; Theodore Maiman was the first to discover the advantages of using a giant pulse of energy to invert a pair of energy levels, and thereby was awarded the honor of being the first over the finish line.
One of the better candidates (proposed by Ali Javan), was an electrical discharge in a low-pressure mixture of neon and helium gases, producing inversion in a pair of neon levels by excitation transfer from metastable helium atoms. Gas discharges are complicated mixtures of relatively simple electronic excitation processes whose light producing properties have been studied for many years. Some of the earliest (1932) publications by Ora S. Duffenback discussed in detail the enhancement of neon spectral lines in a HeNe [helium-neon] discharge through collisions of the second kind. It was this enhancement phenomena that attracted Ali Javan's attention. Indeed, Javan's physical insight was correct; measurements by William R. Bennett and Javan confirmed the possibility of inversion between the neon 2s2 and 2p4 (Paschen notation) levels of neon resulting from enhanced (or resonant) transfer of excitation energy to the neon 2s2 level from the 23S metastable helium level at almost exactly the same energy level. The transition wavelength was in the infra-red at 1.15 microns. The experimental confirmation of inversion and oscillation was a tour de force. Donald Herriott's optical expertise was crucial to the success of the experiment. Spherical mirror optical cavities with their generous alignment tolerance where not well understood at the time, so Herriott had to struggle with the difficult problem of aligning plane mirrors (enclosed within a vacuum tube) to within a couple of arc-seconds to find a high Q cavity resonance. Patience paid off in the end and oscillation at 1.15 microns was achieved in December 1960. It wasn't visible light, but from the Bell Labs point of view it was coherent and continuous, both telephone company imperatives. Like Maiman's ruby laser, the infra-red HeNe laser created a stir throughout Bell Labs and the scientific community. The era of coherent light energy had begun. To many scientists it was the Holy Grail. Herwig Kogelnik, responsible for putting a firm foundation under much that we presently know about laser cavities and laser beams quoted Rudi Kompfner's remark, "Think of all that bandwidth!" Oddly enough, given its extraordinary wide usage today in so many fields, the laser was first publicized in the popular media as a 'solution looking for a problem'.
The US Army Signal Corps Lab, as with most other research labs, was fascinated by the potential of lasers for communications. Soon after the infrared HeNe made a public appearance, the Signal Corps decided it needed a laser of its own to study, so they placed a request with Bell Labs to have one built and shipped to the Signal Corps facility near Red Bank, NJ. They wanted all the latest bells and whistles for their tube which meant Brewster windows, a concave mirror cavity for simple alignment and a hot cathode D.C. discharge for stable, noise-free operation. For one reason or another, the group that originally received the request passed it along to our group. We had just completed development of a gas discharge "talking path" diode which was designed to replace the mechanical relay in switching networks and most of the equipment for making and processing gas discharge tubes was still intact. Ray Sears, our department head at the time, approached us with the Signal Corps request and asked if we were interested.
Needless to say, we (Dane Rigden and myself) jumped at the chance to become involved with gas lasers. Dane had experience in optics and I had been working with gas discharges for several years, so the request was right down our alley. The group originally approached by the Signal Corps helped us get started by providing us with Brewster windows and infrared mirrors. Our glass shop quickly learned how to make the tubes and within a few weeks we had the first model set up on the lab bench with the discharge operating. Since the beam was invisible, we set up an infrared detector and developed a scanning procedure to detect the onset of oscillation. The optical cavity was a spherical mirror cavity, so mirror alignment was a relatively simple task and it wasn't too long before our tube was generating a few milliwatts of coherent 1.15 micron light.
One of the first things we noticed was that the power output was highly sensitive to invisible surface contamination on the Brewster windows. If these weren't cleaned regularly, the output power would rapidly diminish over time. There were minor problems with the thoriated tungsten filament we were using as a hot cathode, so after making some design changes and requesting a new tube from the shop, we decided to come back to the lab evenings and see what could be learned about the properties of the discharge. We also had some half-baked ideas about combining optical pumping with D.C. discharge pumping to increase the power output which we wanted to explore.
A priority in our efforts to learn more about the discharge was to make a spectral scan of the spontaneously emitted light from a neon discharge tube with and without added helium. We were limited to the visible spectrum by the spectrometer we were using, but the scans turned out to be a major surprise. There were several major intensity changes in regions of the neon spectrum when helium was added to the discharge as well as many minor changes. At the same discharge current, the intensity of a number of neon spectral lines increased dramatically. Our source of information on spectral lines and energy levels for helium and neon was the 1957 edition of the American Institute of Physics Handbook. One neon line immediately caught our attention. It was the red 632.8 nm neon line, corresponding to the 3s2 to 2p4 (Paschen notation) transition. A weak line in the pure neon spectrum, its intensity increased more than 50 fold when helium was added to the neon discharge. Clearly something interesting was going on in the gas mixture. Superimposing the helium energy level diagram onto neon level diagram showed us very quickly the likely origin of the enhancement. The upper 3s2 neon energy level was nearly coincident with the 21S helium metastable energy level. Except for differences in absolute values, this coincidence in energy levels was remarkably (and intriguingly) similar to the coincidence that existed between the 2s2 neon level and the 23S helium level, the source of inversion in the 1.15 micron laser.
At this point in our explorations, things were clearly beginning to look interesting. Our first thought was that the remarkable enhancement of the red 632.8nm neon spectral line must have been noticed before and probably published, so we made a search of the recent (English language) literature to see if level lifetime data was available. The search came up empty, but it seems unlikely the effect had never been noticed before. Perhaps a search of early 20th century European literature would have been more fruitful. In any event, the time we could spend investigating the line and its level lifetimes was limited to evenings and weekends. Any idea of repeating Bennett's lifetime measurements on the new energy levels was out of the question. We had neither the instrumentation nor the time to do so.
The question then became what profitably to do next? We did have a phase sensitive amplifier available so we could make gain/loss measurements of the red line using one HeNe tube as a source and a similar tube as a gain/loss tube. In principle it's a simple measurement to make, but the problem we faced was getting the source beam aimed straight along the axis of the meter long gain/loss tube with enough signal to make a measurement. We were able to make measurements finally, but the signal was weak. At best, we concluded the discharge showed high transparency but the results were not precise enough to claim gain. Still, this result was encouraging. One could speculate about ways to increase gain by changing discharge parameters or tube geometry. In any case we decided to take the next step: get a pair of high-reflectivity concave mirrors coated to reflect the red 632.8 nm. line, and a pair of mirror mounts, and look for oscillation. Acquiring the mirror blanks and mounts was not a problem; we purchased them from Edmund Scientific quite inexpensively. Having the mirrors coated with special low-loss dielectric coatings was going to be expensive, costing perhaps as much as $200, but we were able to persuade our supervisor, Gordon Cooper, to sign the purchase order. Dane, not wanting to give away our plans, ordered the mirrors coated at 636.0 nm, close enough to 632.8 nm for high reflectivity but not so close others could guess what we were up to.
It took about three weeks for the coated mirrors to arrive from Bausch and Lomb. There was already a tube on the pump station when the mirrors were delivered, but it was large bore (6 -7 mm) and we were fairly sure a smaller bore tube would have more gain. Nevertheless we decided to check out the new mirrors, so we returned to the Labs that evening after asking a colleague, Darwin Perry, to come in and help out. We installed the new mirrors, flushed and sparked the tube several times to get it clean and filled it with a helium-neon mixture to what we judged was about the right pressure and started the discharge. Dane, impatient to get the mirrors aligned, put his eye up close to the output mirror (...!) to see if could spot some visual indication of alignment. His intuition proved correct; as both mirrors were brought closer to alignment, the light coming out along the tube axis brightened considerably.
None of us knew what to expect looking down the tube, but after a while Dane casually mentioned that he could see sparkles of brilliant red light on the tube axis that looked like little red stars. This was interesting, but it wasn't at all like the broad mode patterns we expected to see based on photographs of the beam coming from the infrared laser. Suddenly I realized that what he was seeing was the laser beam coming from an apparently distant point source. His eye focussed the nearly plane wave front to a point just as it does with light from a distant star. I looked for myself and confirmed Dane's observation. Both of us were aware that looking down the tube axis was not the safest way to confirm lasing, but it was clear this laser was not a hole-burner like the ruby, so we weren't overly concerned. When projected on a wall, the red beam mode pattern was only intermittently visible as the mirrors went in and out of alignment due to ambient vibrations. Since the tube seemed about ready to fail, I called down to Darwin Perry on the floor below to come up quickly and witness the laser before it quit completely. Later he told us he thought someone had been badly injured because of the urgency in my voice. In the next few minutes the tube died, but all of us had witnessed it lase. It was the first continuous visible laser and we were the first three people on earth to have seen it. Nowadays, of course, with literally hundreds of different visible lines lasing, our experience that night seems insignificant.
At the time we felt a visibly bright, continuous laser was an important development, but that didn't really sink in until a day or two later after we had a new tube made with a much brighter beam which could be projected hundreds of feet down the hallway with very little diffraction spreading. People came by from all areas of the lab to see the latest, bright, totally saturated, red laser beam. Unlike the high-power pulsed ruby laser beam, this 10 milliwatt beam could be allowed to impinge on one's hand without danger. Of course the light intensity inside the cavity was orders of magnitude higher than the output beam intensity so it was no surprise to see every speck of dust on the Brewster windows light up brilliantly. Now we could see why cleaning the Brewster windows periodically on the 1.15 micron laser was so important. The reward for our discovery came rather quickly; within days we were given carte blanche to exploit our discovery, and a budget to match.
One final recollection; Julius Molnar, then a vice president with a comprehensive background in gas discharge physics, came into our lab one morning shortly after the red HeNe laser had operated for the first time. He walked slowly around the lab, examined the laser closely, put his hand in the beam, shook his head a few time as if to make sure he wasn't dreaming, and then asked of no one in particular, "Do they really pay you guys for doing this?"
J.P. Gordon et al. Phys. Rev. 95 (1954), 282.
A.L. Schawlow and C.H. Townes. Phys. Rev. 112 (1958), 1940.
T.H. Maiman. Nature 187 (1960), 493.
A. Javan et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (1961), 106.
A.D. White and J.D. Rigden. Proc. IRE 50 (1962), 1697.
Ali Javan. The History of the Laser
Rudi Kompfner: A Biographical Memoir by J. R. Pierce
Julius Paul Molnar: A Memorial Tribute by Emannuel R. Piore